Editorial Policy

The acceptance criteria for all articles are the article’s quality, originality and significance to our readership. Except where otherwise stated, manuscripts are peer-reviewed by two anonymous reviewers and the Editor. The final decision is given by the Editorial Board, which reserves the right to refuse any material for publication.
Manuscripts should be written in a clear, concise, direct style. Editor-in-Chief or the Editorial Board reserves the right to change the format, grammar, or sentence structure of any part of the manuscript to comply with the guidelines to fit the standard format and journal style. Accepted manuscripts are copy-edited for grammar, punctuation, format, and clarity. Artificial intelligence technology is partially used in the English language correction of articles. A PDF proof of the manuscript is sent to the corresponding author and their publication approval is requested within 2 days of receipt of the proof.
Any information regarding a properly submitted paper is confidential and should not be shared with anyone other than the corresponding author(s), reviewer(s), potential reviewer(s), editorial board member(s), and the publisher(s). Editor-in-Chief should obtain necessary disclosure and conflict of interest statements from the author(s). Reviewers who seek assistance from a trainee or colleague in the performance of a review should acknowledge these individuals' contributions in the written comments submitted to the editor. Reviewers must maintain the confidentiality of the manuscript, which may prohibit the uploading of the manuscript to software or other AI technologies where confidentiality cannot be assured. Reviewers must request permission from the journal prior to using AI technology to facilitate their review.

Editor-in-Chief should take necessary measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a published paper, in conjunction with the publisher.